Warren Grimes
In women’s hoops, as in a number of other team sports, the
Pac-12 conference honors players for their performance during the week – the
Player of the Week (PoW) and the Freshman of the Week (FoW) awards. The conference has dispensed 22 awards over the last 11 weeks. These awards are a way of
promoting the sport and building fan interest – so far not much to dislike.
Washington State has won the FoW award six times. Each went to
Charlisse Leger-Walker. UCLA has won the PoW award 4 times (Charisma
Osborne has won twice). Both of these
teams are very good – but lack the depth and balance of other top teams.
Meanwhile, the top two teams in the conference (Stanford and
Arizona) plus another team in the top four (Oregon) have each won an award only
once. For Stanford, the sole award
recipient is Haley Jones, who won the PoW award in the second week of the
season.
Although rebounds, assists, and steals are frequently mentioned
in announcing the winner, the chief criteria for the awards is points
scored. Charlisse Leger-Walker does a
lot for the WSU team, but it is her point-scoring that has given her six FoW
awards. It is standard for any weekly
award winner to have had at least one 20 plus-point performance during the week.
To win games, a team must score points and play defense to limit an opponent’s points. The weekly awards honor offensive performance but
almost totally ignore defense. In
season-ending awards, the Pac-12 does recognize defensive performance, but this
sensitivity is nowhere to be seen in the weekly recognitions. If it were, a player such as Anna Wilson
would have been recognized. Consider,
for example, Wilson’s performance in holding Charlisse Leger-Walker to season
low numbers during Stanford’s back to back victories over WSU.
Another idiosyncrasy is the treatment of players who don’t play 30 plus minutes on court. Stanford is blessed with depth that keeps many of its top players on the court for fewer minutes (Kiana Williams is the only Stanford player averaging over 30 minutes).
Cameron Brink is a great example. Since joining the starting lineup, Brink has
averaged just over 20 minutes per game.
Despite this, Brink leads the conference in at least three categories:
(1) field goal percentage (60.7%); (2) rebounds (Brink is 6th in the
conference in rebounds per game, but first in rebounds per minute); and (3)
blocks per game. Two of the categories
are defensive (Brink’s defensive boards and blocks). Brink was nominated for the FoW for the week
ending Feb. 7. Averaging just over 20
minutes per game, Brink had a double-double against Utah (10 boards, 12 points
and 3 blocks) and was equally impressive against Colorado (8 boards, 13 points
and 6 blocks). But Brink lost out to
Leger-Walker’s 20 plus point performances against USC and UCLA.
The award system leaves players like Brink under
recognized. It also leaves teams with depth and balance under recognized – and that would be Stanford and probably Oregon as
well. As a team, Stanford leads the
conference in a long list of categories, both offensive (points scored, scoring
margin, field goal percentage, rebounding offense, and rebounding margin) and
defensive (scoring defense, field goal percentage defense, blocked shots, three
point percentage defense, and rebounding defense). These category wins are team wins. Stanford does not have players (other than Brink)
who lead the conference in any individual category.
Stanford’s statistical dominance is more pronounced than any
Stanford team within recent memory. That
statistical balance is a strength – it gives Stanford more options in critical
moments of a close game.
Statistical dominance, however, does not assure
victory. In the two losses, UCLA and
Colorado bested Stanford despite these two teams far weaker showing in overall
conference statistics. And Oregon, which
shows well in conference stats, has two lopsided losses to Arizona, which lags
a bit in conference stats.
The Pac 12 is a tough conference. So matchups, game strategy, and motivation
are wild cards that will determine the outcome of many a game. On paper, Stanford should win out in the
conference. But in practice, Stanford will be
threatened in most if not all of its remaining conference games.
As far as the conference’s player of the week awards, they
do leave a balanced and deep team like Stanford under recognized. When Stanford wins, that lack of recognition
matters little. The wins are the best
form of recognition. Any day of the week, I’d take a conference
championship over all the player of the week awards. Perhaps, however, the conference should consider a weekly award for defensive prowess.
Stay safe!