A strange thought.
But let me explain.
Last year at this time, FIBA conducted its Women’s Under 19 World
Cup in Bangkok, Thailand. The United
States team won that competition by the slimmest of margins. In the end game, Australia led late into the
final minutes. Team USA rallied to tie
the game at the buzzer. In overtime, the
USA prevailed, but Team Australia had established itself as a meaningful threat
to US dominance.
Next season’s Stanford roster will include two players from
Team USA and one from Team Australia.
One of these, Fran Belibi, is already known to Stanford fans. In Thailand, Belibi did not start for the team,
but was one of the first players off the bench.
She averaged 7.7 points and 7.3 rebounds in just over 16 minutes per
game. She was disruptive on defense,
blocking and deflecting, stealing and intimidating. Her rebounding efficiency was the best of any
player in the 16-team tournament. That's impressive. Her
68.8% field goal conversion was also impressive.
These strengths were reflected in Belibi’s freshman year on the
Farm. The potential for a sophomore leap
is strong.
A new player on next year’s roster will be Agnes Emma Nnopu,
who played impressively for team Australia.
Nnopu averaged more minutes than Belibi – 23.2 per game. Her point production, an average of 6.1 per
game, was below that of Belibi. Nnopu,
however, can shoot the three ball and was proficient from the free throw line
(78.6%). She’s also a dedicated
defender. In the tournament, Nnopu’s
most notable accomplishment came as an offensive rebounder. Nnopu had 52 rebounds in the seven-game
tournament, with a whopping 65.4% of these offensive boards. That’s unusual and shows how active Nnopu was
on the court. Belibi, by contrast, was a
more efficient rebounder on a per minute basis, but 64.7% of her boards were
defensive. Nnopu is not a post player
and will likely defend on the perimeter, but she finds a way to get the boards
and to get it done both offensively and defensively. She’ll be fun to watch.
Last, but not least, Cameron Brink played on team USA in the
Bangkok tournament. Appearing in only 5
games (and averaging just 8 minutes per game), Brink averaged just 2 points per
game but was an excellent defender and rebounder. Brink’s shot blocking (on a per minute basis)
was superior to that of Belibi and other posts.
Had Brink seen more minutes, her stats would certainly have impressed. Brink is a top 10 recruit, the highest ranked
in this year’s class. Her all around
game includes ball handling, outside shooting and assist making. Brink will be difficult to keep off the
floor.
The third new player on Stanford’s roster, Jana Van Gytenbeek,
lacks a direct Bangkok connection. This
promising young point guard, however, has chosen to work out this Summer with a
group of young Stanford players that includes two Bangkok veterans, Belibi and
Brink. If some of the Thai connection rubs off, watch out for Van Gytenbeek.
So yes, experience in Bangkok can be part of the formula for
success at Stanford. All of these players
will be exciting to watch when the new season commences. For this to happen, Nnopu has to
find her way
to the US, and all of us have to come to grips with the pandemic.
It will be done.
4 comments:
It's worth noting that in the end game of the Bangkok tournament, Nnopu had a splendid showing against the strong US team. She played for 35 minutes, an indication that her coaches wanted her on the floor. The box score results were 9 points, 10 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 steals, and 2 blocks. Not bad!
Warren
As always I greatly enjoyed your blog piece and learned from it. How do you see next season happening? Will it likely be played in empty gyms? Or greatly disbursed crowds limited to social distanced seating? Or cancelled? So glad to get some info on Nnopu she's going to help us. Do you have a prediction for the Final Four? Charlie Creme seems ready to hand it to the Gamecocks.
Malcolm McFall
I'm an optimist that the season, or most of it, will be played. Beyond that, I don't have a clear sense yet about whether fans will be present. So far, other sports that are being played seem to be for TV only (no fans).
One reason for my optimism is that revenue considerations strongly dictate that the season be played, at least for the Pac 12 network (which contributes substantially to the athletic department revenues for all the conference teams). Stanford's decision to drop 11 sports is an indication that the school is concerned about revenue issues.
The season is scheduled to begin in November and the NCAA tournament is not over until the end of March. That's almost a 5 month period. So far, we've had about 5 months of pandemic in the US, just to get some perspective on this. So a lot could change over that period.
I shy away from predictions, but very much believe that Stanford is capable of doing really well, including getting to the Final 4 and beyond.
Nice article, thanks. Isn't her name Agnes Emma-Nnopu (as shown on the Stanford roster), making Emma part of her surname, not a middle name? So referring to her as just Nnopu looks wrong.
Post a Comment