Warren Grimes
JuJu Watkins is an amazing player-- the best USC has ever
had. She is more versatile and has more
finesse than either Lisa Leslie or Tina Thompson. She is a wonderful point guard who can battle
with the bigs on the inside. Quite
simply a phenom who can shoot inside and out, block, defend, board, and
assist. She emphatically documented this
by scoring 51 points against Stanford, a national best for the year. As a freshman, she is well positioned to be
the conference player of the year.
The disappearing Pac-12 has had some fantastic players,
including Washington’s Kelsey Plum and Oregon’s Sabrina Ionescu. If I get to choose first, it’s an easy
choice: I’ll take Juju Watkins any day
of the week.
Watkins scored all but 16 of USC’s 67 points in the upset
win over Stanford on Friday night.
Stanford still won the interior battle:
Brink had 19 points and 15 boards; Iriafen had 16 points and 9
boards. But both shot poorly – their
collective 31% is well below either player’s average. USC played tough on the inside, in the
process fouling out 3 of its interior players.
They had enough, however, to disrupt Stanford’s offense and limit the
team to 58 points on 31.6% shooting.
The game was a disappointment because, Watkins notwithstanding,
a team that exploited USC’s defensive choices could have prevailed. On any given day, USC can challenge anyone. But a team that relies so heavily on one
player is vulnerable when the star has an off day. We’ll see.
Would Stanford be able to bounce back against number-7
ranked UCLA? Any doubt seemed resolved
when Stanford converted its first six shots.
The team never looked back. Stanford
more than doubled its shooting percentage from the previous game – from 31.6%
to 63.5% - the best percentage in a decade.
37 of those points came from
Brink and Iriafen, but contributions came from Jump (10) and four other players
with 5 or more points. There were 17
turnovers, always an issue when playing UCLA, but Stanford compensated by blocking
10 UCLA attempts and outrebounding the Bruins 43 to 29.
UCLA played without its pivotal inside player Lauren Betts
and missed a bunch of other talented bigs.
Emily Bessoir, a 6 -4 big who can shoot the three, is injured and will
miss the entire season. Izzy Anstey, 6 -4, was also out for medical reasons. Lina Sontag, 6 -3 and from Germany, started against
Cal but left before the Stanford game to join the national team for Olympic try
outs. That left Angela Dugalic, also 6-4
but relatively inexperienced. She scored
6 points in 22 minutes on the floor (and now leaves for Serbia to play with the
Serbian national team). UCLA has superior guards but is quite unexpectedly short
of tall talent. The Bruins desperately
need Betts to come back, or at least for Olympic try outs to end.
Stanford is still favorably positioned to win the
conference. They are tied with Colorado,
each with two losses. But Colorado will
face Utah, UCLA, and USC, all on the road.
Stanford’s toughest road game, at least on paper, is against Oregon
State. Of course, as VanDerveer constantly
reminds her team, any conference team can knock you down.
Brink now has four consecutive games with 15 plus points and
15 plus boards. Even more critical for
the defense, Brink had 15 blocks in the two weekend games. Her 3.6 block average for conference games
makes it easier for Stanford to focus on perimeter defense. It’s no surprise that Stanford is 1st
in the conference in three-point conversions allowed and second in conference percentage field goal defense. Brink makes any opponent rethink their
offense. Meanwhile, no Stanford opponent
has been able to stop Kiki Iriafen. The
two players make one another better. Stanford
is first in the conference in rebounding margin.
For Stanford to improve further, the perimeter players must
add to the offensive diversity of this team. More than anything else, to win,
Stanford must maintain focus and intensity for every minute in every single
matchup.
1 comment:
Appreciate the perspective. JuJu is definitely a once-in-a-generation player. I think it's too early, though, to say she's the best. At this point in time, I think Cheryl Miller still wears that crown. She had great players around her, too, so didn't *need* to score 80% of her teams points.
Post a Comment